Search for: All records

The human body represents a collection of interacting systems that range in scale from nanometers to meters. Investigations from a systems perspective focus on how the parts work together to enact changes across spatial scales, and further our understanding of how systems function and fail. Here, we highlight systems approaches presented at the 2022 Summer Biomechanics, Bio-engineering, and Biotransport Conference in the areas of solid mechanics; fluid mechanics; tissue and cellular engineering; biotransport; and design, dynamics, and rehabilitation; and biomechanics education. Systems approaches are yielding new insights into human biology by leveraging state-of-the-art tools, which could ultimately lead to more informed design of therapies and medical devices for preventing and treating disease as well as rehabilitating patients using strategies that are uniquely optimized for each patient. Educational approaches can also be designed to foster a foundation of systems-level thinking. 

Abstract The intervertebral disc is a complex structure that experiences multiaxial stresses regularly. Disc failure through herniation is a common cause of lower back pain, which causes reduced mobility and debilitating pain, resulting in heavy socioeconomic burdens. Unfortunately, herniation etiology is not well understood, partially due to challenges in replicating herniation in vitro. Previous studies suggest that flexion elevated risks of herniation. Thus, the objective of this study was to use a multiscale and multiphasic finite element model to evaluate the risk of failure under torque- or muscle-driven flexion. Models were developed to represent torque-driven flexion with the instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) located on the disc, and the more physiologically representative muscle-driven flexion with the ICR located anterior of the disc. Model predictions highlighted disparate disc mechanics regarding bulk deformation, stress-bearing mechanisms, and intradiscal stress–strain distributions. Specifically, failure was predicted to initiate at the bone-disc boundary under torque-driven flexion, which may explain why endplate junction failure, instead of herniation, has been the more common failure mode observed in vitro. By contrast, failure was predicted to initiate in the posterolateral annulus fibrosus under muscle-driven flexion, resulting in consistent herniation. Our findings also suggested that muscle-driven flexion combined with axial compression could be sufficient for provoking herniation in vitro and in silico. In conclusion, this study provided a computational framework for designing in vitro testing protocols that can advance the assessment of disc failure behavior and the performance of engineered disc implants. 

Abstract Painful herniated discs are treated surgically by removing extruded nucleus pulposus (NP) material (nucleotomy). NP removal through enzymatic digestion is also commonly performed to initiate degenerative changes to study potential biological repair strategies. Experimental and computational studies have shown a decrease in disc stiffness with nucleotomy under single loading modalities, such as compression-only or bending-only loading. However, studies that apply more physiologically relevant loading conditions, such as compression in combination with bending or torsion, have shown contradicting results. We used a previously validated bone–disc–bone finite element model (Control) to create a Nucleotomy model to evaluate the effect of dual loading conditions (compression with torsion or bending) on intradiscal deformations. While disc joint stiffness decreased with nucleotomy under single loading conditions, as commonly reported in the literature, dual loading resulted in an increase in bending stiffness. More specifically, dual loading resulted in a 40% increase in bending stiffness under flexion and extension and a 25% increase in stiffness under lateral bending. The increase in bending stiffness was due to an increase and shift in compressive stress, where peak stresses migrated from the NP–annulus interface to the outer annulus. In contrast, the decrease in torsional stiffness was due to greater fiber reorientation during compression. In general, large radial strains were observed with nucleotomy, suggesting an increased risk for delamination or degenerative remodeling. In conclusion, the effect of nucleotomy on disc mechanics depends on the type and complexity of applied loads. 

A comprehensive understanding of biological tissue mechanics is crucial for designing engineered tissues that aim to recapitulate native tissue behavior. Tensile mechanics of many fiber-reinforced tissues have been shown to depend on specimen geometry, which makes it challenging to compare data between studies. In this study, a validated multiscale, structure-based finite element model was used to evaluate the effect of specimen geometry on multiscale annulus fibrosus tensile mechanics through a fiber engagement analysis. The relationships between specimen geometry and modulus, Poisson’s ratio, tissue stress–strain distributions, and fiber reorientation behaviors were investigated at both tissue and sub-tissue levels. It was observed that annulus fibrosus tissue level tensile properties and stress transmission mechanisms were dependent on specimen geometry. The model also demonstrated that the contribution of fiber–matrix interactions to tissue mechanical response was specimen size- and orientation- dependent. The results of this study reinforce the benefits of structure-based finite element modeling in studies investigating multiscale tissue mechanics. This approach also provides guidelines for developing optimal combined computational-experimental study designs for investigating fiber-reinforced biological tissue mechanics. Additionally, findings from this study help explain the geometry dependence of annulus fibrosus tensile mechanics previously reported in the literature, providing a more fundamental and comprehensive understanding of tissue mechanical behavior. In conclusion, the methods presented here can be used in conjunction with experimental tissue level data to simultaneously investigate tissue and sub-tissue scale mechanics, which is important as the field of soft tissue biomechanics advances toward studies that focus on diminishing length scales. 

Abstract Intervertebral disc research has sought to develop a deeper understanding of spine biomechanics, the complex relationship between disc health and back pain, and the mechanisms of spinal injury and repair. To do so, many researchers have focused on characterizing tissue-level properties of the disc, where the roles of tissue subcomponents can be more systematically investigated. Unfortunately, experimental challenges often limit the ability to measure important disc tissue- and subtissue-level behaviors, including fiber–matrix interactions, transient nutrient and electrolyte transport, and damage propagation. Numerous theoretical and numerical modeling frameworks have been introduced to explain, complement, guide, and optimize experimental research efforts. The synergy of experimental and computational work has significantly advanced the field, and these two aspects have continued to develop independently and jointly. Meanwhile, the relationship between experimental and computational work has become increasingly complex and interdependent. This has made it difficult to interpret and compare results between experimental and computational studies, as well as between solely computational studies. This paper seeks to explore issues of model translatability, robustness, and efficient study design, and to propose and motivate potential future directions for experimental, computational, and combined tissue-level investigations of the intervertebral disc.